How simple is it to get positive emotions?

Reactions from the readers of the last blog post: so, to get creative and open minded, one just needs to have positive emotions. But my emotional state is what it is, what can I do about it?

Well if you have read the book you know the answer – but never mind let’s reveal here one of the most important secrets.

We all know that emotions have effect on our body posture, our tone of voice… The secret is that the reverse is true. Our posture, our movements, our actions, influence our emotions.

You don’t believe it?

For yourself to smile in front of your computer.

Don’t bother, nobody is looking. Just force yourself to smile.

Hold the smile for 30 seconds no less.

How do you feel now? My guess is: happier, more positive, right?

Laughing club in India
Laughing club in India

The ultimate is to practice a healthy daily dose of laughter like these laughing clubs in India meeting every morning to start the day in the most positive manner. Try it. Force yourself to laugh. You’ll see how positive you’ll get.

So, next time you feel down, consciously change your posture, force yourself to smile, laugh even. Your positive mood will be back. And with it your open, creative mind.

Smile again. Hold the smile. You’re part of the Fourth Revolution. You are practicing the holistic practice, involving body and mind. You see, it’s that simple.

Welcome.

Share

What’s the use of feeling more positive?

I stumbled the other day upon a very interesting question: what are positive emotions for?

The use of negative emotions, and how they change our physiology, is quite well known. Fear mobilizes our main muscles for running, anger brings blood to our arms for fight etc. But what are the physiological changes brought by positive emotions, apart from a nice warm smile?

Interestingly enough, not a lot of people seemed to be interested by the question until the Fourth Revolution was upon us!

open one's mind
open one's mind

Barbara Frederickson, a distinguished psychologist, proposed an explanation in a 1998 article: what good are positive emotions? The paper is a bit long and dry. Though, the basic thesis is quite simple: positive emotions promote an open-mind!

Negative emotions close our mind, so that we focus on the object of the hazard and concentrate on our (survival reaction). Positive emotions and relaxation promote games, learning new things, creativity.

So, if you want to be more creative and open-minded, a key to success in the collaborative age, one simple solution: think positive more often! When do you start?

Share

Stop disseminating the image of the factory worker as a representation of the economy!

Right now there are a lot of articles and communication in the media about employment and unemployment. I’m really struck how this topic is presented.

picture of a factory worker
picture of a factory worker

Did you remark how much this communication is reinforcing the “Industrial Age” view of employment? And, be it on TV or in the press, the images and videos associated are always showing factory workers.

For example the enclosed picture is just extracted from the New York Times. It was a paper about the Italian economy. But – the Italian economy is never going to recover through more factory employment!!

Let’s stop it! Factory workers are now becoming a minority. It’s not where the value lies, nor where the good paying jobs lie!

The media is still reinforcing the Industrial Age mindset of jobs being factory employment jobs. When will the media show people in a service environment, when will the media show K.E.E.N. at work without a tag mentioning how these are strange animals?

Share

Emotional attachment is what makes products valuable

Exactly as the value chain of human activities goes from manual work to intellectual work (processing) to emotional work, so does the value chain of products.

iPhone vs normal phone
iPhone vs normal phone

Successful products today are those that bring us to develop an emotional attachment. Product differentiation based only on performance is boring. That is, unless the possession of a highly powered shiny item makes us feel the emotion of ego’s satisfaction!

So why is the iPhone so successful, and at the same time so highly priced? Because it provokes a deep emotional attachment to its content through music and other features, because it is the do-it-all solution solver. The phone on the right does not generate any emotional attachment. It is a commodity. We just want the cheapest.

If you want your product to be successful, there is only one way: create an emotional attachment. When do you review your current products, or what you are doing in the office, in that light?

Share

Emotional work: where the value lies today

Today, in the Fourth Revolution, what is the value chain of human activities like?

At the bottom is manual work. That’s worth almost nothing, because anybody can do it.

Above that is intellectual work, in the sense of processing work (IQ). In the Industrial Age that was the tip of the value chain, because processing capability was scarce. Those who were very good at it were highly paid and regarded. The problem is that now, we have a lot of processing capability available in the form of computers and the like. Its value has melted away.

So what’s next?

Emotional work. Today, it is where the value lies. It is what leaders get paid to do. It is both personal internal emotional work, and exceptional inter-personal work. And that’s the basis of soft power. Power today does not lie in hard facts and logic. Power lies in the soft issues of emotions.

Scary, maybe, because our mindset is geared toward the value of intellectual work. But so real. How much emotional work do you think you are doing? Do more, that’s where the value is. That’s where the difference is. That’s what will make you successful.

 

Share

People are not cogs – a simple truth, so often forgotten!

People as cogs
Industrial Age Organization: People as cogs

In the Industrial Age, people were cogs. Manpower plans would be made, and the man-power adapted like the horse-power and the steam-power.

Today people are not cogs any more. Still many executives still forget that. Read this instructive post from the Harvard Business Review, people are not cogs.

Industrial Age culture was very much about considering people as replaceable production elements. Collaborative Age culture is about considering each person as a unique capability that might not be so easily replaced, in particular when it comes to team dynamics.

What do you observe in your organizations or environment? Do you see a trend toward the Collaborative Age view or do you feel the Industrial Age mindset is still very strong?

 

Share

Solutions to the national debt crisis 2/2: reviewing our tax base

Our current tax base will soon be obsolete. It needs to be replaced by taxation of our new collaborative capabilities.

During the Agricultural Age, tax was based on a share of the crops. When the Third Revolution came – which would eventually lead to the Industrial Revolution, a new value system was created that soon dwarfed Agricultural value: Industry. The governments which had relied since centuries on agricultural tax became weaker and weaker. They had to get money lent to them by the new ‘bourgeois’, who created value by trade or industry. The system became less and less stable as the traditional governing elite became relatively poorer and poorer, as industrial value increased orders of magnitude above agricultural value.

Today in developed countries, agriculture represents 2 to 3% of the GDP. Even if it was taxed entirely it would not represent much of the 30-50% which is swallowed by taxes and social security payments!

Today, we are again in the same situation. Our tax system is mostly based on Industrial Age value. A new value production system has been created with the Fourth Revolution that is expanding and that will eventually dwarf the Industrial Age value. The only way to get out of this conundrum is to change our tax base to effectively tax the Collaborative Age value! This is going to be difficult immediately because our accounting systems which date from the Industrial Age do not account for it.

The Agricultural Age example also reminds us that tax is not necessarily only money, it can also be in kind, including the time of people doing certain activities for the public good.

The solution is thus not to increase tax the Industrial Age way. It is to create new ways of deriving a share of the tremendous value created by collaboration for the public good. Because collaborative value is not linked to geography, countries will find it difficult to create such new taxes on their own. The solution needs to be internationally agreed.  But that is the only possible way forward to avoid our governments to become relatively poorer and poorer.

The challenge is huge but so important for the stability of our societies that it should be taken upfront. Do you have ideas on the matter?

Share

Solutions to the national debt crisis 1/2: reviewing our social contract

We won’t solve the national debt crisis following the same mindset we have currently. This mindset, this logic we have inherited from the Industrial Age.

Solving the national debt crisis will necessarily require thinking outside the box, outside the usual operation of our social institutions. New institutions will need to be created, current institutions will become obsolete. The change that is required is a rupture change.

The balance of national accounts is a balance between income and expenses of our collective institutions (government, social security, etc). It requires first to understand what collective institutions we need and want – the basis of our social contract. Over time most developed countries have evolved collective institutions that provide a significant protection to individuals (health, minimum social support, justice), protection of society as a whole (military, police), implementation and building collective infrastructure (roads, etc),and a large number of other important services related to information management and statistics.

These national institutions are generally governmental and not submitted to competition. They don’t have to adapt to the new conditions of the world as quickly and thoroughly as other organizations.

In many instance those collective protection institutions have based their intervention on a standard career path and value production environment – mandatory age for retirement, structure of health insurance based on salaried employment, etc.

As the Fourth Revolution unfolds with more diverse lives, some developing internationally, these approaches will prove increasingly obsolete.

Yet it remains important to provide a minimum social protection to anyone should life be unkind. This is typically provided in the form of an insurance, averaging the risk over a large number of people and instances.

The first way to address the debt crisis is thus to ask again what core needs our social institutions should address. Protection needs to be made personal, not collective, because our lives will be more diverse – that is a significant change. Creating the right infrastructure is key to the economical development, requires long term funding beyond the normal horizon of private investors – public implication is needed. Etc.

The second way to address the debt crisis is to examine whether submitting the institutions that deliver these services to competition could not deliver a more sustainable service. Indeed the fact that information management is now available to anyone, and not just reserved to expensive bureaucracy as it was a few decades ago, is a key change brought by the Fourth Revolution. Most traditionally public functions can now be delivered reliably by private organizations. Why hesitate?

Share

The national debt crisis is a normal consequence of the Fourth Revolution

No wonder the developed world suffers of a national debt crisis: with the Fourth Revolution spreading, the value production systems shifts. Our traditional government funding and operation are obsolete. As well as the traditional remediation solutions.

National Debt Crisis
The national debt crisis becomes unsustainable

Because tax systems are based on an Industrial Age view of the value production system, taxes necessarily shrink relative to the overall economy.

Because social support systems and government operation are based on Industrial Age view of career, retirement, social support, scope of responsibility of government, expenses continue to be huge, and to increase.

With the Fourth Revolution, instant transmittal of information and funds, and globalization, gone is the golden age of the Industrial Age where governments could resolve this dilemma by creating more money, devaluating currencies, playing with trade barriers.

The debt crisis is a direct consequence of the fact that our collective social systems are still operating under the framework of the Industrial Age while the world is already in the Fourth Revolution.

For governments, to continue along the sames lines as before will at best delay the inevitable. But that is what all governments do right now! We need to take the grasp of the fundamental shift of our societies. A Revolution in our social contract is needed. Now.

Share

Ideas multiplication – by George Bernard Shaw

We speak a lot about creativity and the fact that creativity happens when two unrelated ideas meet.

Two green apples
Two green apples of creativity

I like that quote from George Bernard Shaw:
If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange apples then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas

Think about it. A century ago ideas met at the rate of a man on a horse. Today ideas meet millions or billions times more often in the same timespan. The Fourth Revolution is there. Ineluctable.

Go out and encounter new ideas! And create new ones! And share…

Share

The Fourth Revolution: grieving the world we understood

It is well known to change practitioners that people, when faced with a significant change that touch them emotionally, go through stages of grief. The classical model involves the following successive stages:

  • Denial
  • Anger
  • Bargaining
  • Depression
  • Acceptance
  • Gratefulness

So, the same happens when faced by an earth-shattering transformation like the Fourth Revolution. We are grieving the world we understood, which seemed so stable and so easy to understand.

A large number of people are in still in denial; others are angry of their perceived lack of control over what is evolving. Others try to bargain out of it so as to remain on the side of the road in minimum comfort. Still others are in total depression because they feel they can’t cope with the changes of the world. And some – a minority – perceive this change as an opportunity.

An excellent resource on the particular case of social media is the post by Amber Naslund on Social media adoption and the stages of grief.

So, regarding the Fourth Revolution, at what stage of grief are you?

Share